“Kinds of Kindness” deeply interrogates the tension between destiny and choice, showing how personal agency is constantly constrained—and sometimes overpowered—by external forces. Across its three stories, the film maps out different landscapes in which characters seek freedom, often discovering they’re bound by sys…
How destiny vs. choice plays out in each part
-
The Death of R.M.F. Robert’s life is virtually scripted by Raymond, his boss, who dictates everything from his meals and sex life to what he reads. Robert’s sense of choice is an illusion: he agrees to follow every instruction until Raymond’s demand—murder—forces him to confront how much of his life is truly his own.
-
R.M.F. Is Flying Daniel, a policeman, experiences a different kind of loss of control. His missing wife, Liz, returns changed, and Daniel becomes consumed by escalating suspicion and paranoia. His choices—to investigate, to question reality, to act on fear—suggest he’s fighting destiny, but it’s unclear whether his destiny is rewritten or revealed.
-
R.M.F. Eats a Sandwich In a cult devoted to resurrecting the dead, characters pursue a kind of ultimate power over life and death—a destiny that’s spiritual, mythic, or delusional. Their belief in a higher purpose substitutes destiny for agency; choices become rituals or proofs rather than true autonomy.
Recurring motifs that bind destiny and choice
-
Control as a destiny-shaping force: In every story, characters are oppressed by invisible forces—bosses, societal structures, relationships—suggesting that destiny often hides in the systems we inherit or consent to rather than something externally ordained.
-
Self-delusion vs. clarity: Characters believe they are exercising choice even when they’re deeply compromised. The film pushes us to ask when belief in free will is itself a component of one’s destiny.
-
Choice as resistance: Moments when characters refuse to comply—Robert backtracking on murder, Daniel questioning his sanity, cult members challenging rituals—become acts of breaking the pattern. These are rare and often unsettling, but they highlight that even within destiny, there’s scope for betrayal or revolt.
Overall viewpoint
“Kinds of Kindness” suggests destiny isn’t predetermined fate, but a karmic mesh of power, control, and belief that limits and shapes choices. Choice exists, but often at the cost of suffering or identity. The film doesn’t offer comfort; instead, it shows how striving to choose is part of what makes us human, even when free will seems compromised.
If you want, I can point out specific scenes or dialogue that best capture this tension.
Sources
Provider metadata
Tap to read source excerpt
Web search
Open source